Kuldeep v. State of Haryana and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
Cr.W.P. challenged an order declining parole to admit children to school. Court upheld the rejection, holding the brother looking after the children could also arrange admission.
Cr.W.P. challenged an order declining parole to admit children to school. Court upheld the rejection, holding the brother looking after the children could also arrange admission.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH.
Crl. W.P. No. 890 of 2010
DATE OF DECISION : 12.05.2010
Kuldeep
.... PETITIONER
Versus
State of Haryana and others
..... RESPONDENTS
CORAM :- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SATISH KUMAR MITTAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JORA SINGH
Present: Mr. Kanwar Satbir Singh, Advocate, for the petitioner.
SATISH KUMAR MITTAL , J. ( Oral )
The petitioner, who is undergoing imprisonment in case FIR No. 274 dated 23.8.2007 under Section 304-B IPC, registered at Police Station Smalkha, District Panipat, and is now confined in District Jail, Karnal, has filed this petition for quashing the order dated 6.4.2010 (Annexure P-1), whereby his prayer for temporary release on parole for getting the admission of his kids to the school has been declined.
We have heard learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the impugned order, according to which the temporary parole has been declined on the ground that two children of the petitioner, aged 4 ½ years and 3 ½ years are residing with the younger brother of the petitioner, who is looking after them.
In view of the aforesaid facts, we are of the opinion that the
Crl. W.P. No. 890 of 2010 -2-
authorities have rightly declined the prayer of the petitioner for his temporary release on parole, as his brother, who is looking after the children of the petitioner, can also get their admission in the appropriate school. No ground for interference in the impugned order is made out.
Dismissed.
( SATISH KUMAR MITTAL ) JUDGE
May 12, 2010 ( JORA SINGH ) ndj JUDGE
Kuldeep
State of Haryana
Satish Kumar Mittal
Jora Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court