In a contempt petition, the court noted that the petitioners had already been paid the difference of special allowance. Finding the proceeding infructuous, the matter was disposed of without further orders.
Proceedings disposed of as having been rendered infructuous without further orders.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
COCP No. 1646 of 2010 Date of decision:- 25.10.2010
Hari Chand and another
......petitioners
vs.
Sh. K.B.S. Sidhu, IAS ......respondent
CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA
Present: - Mr. H.S. Dhindsa, Advocate for the petitioners Mr. S.S. Sahu, AAG, Punjab
HEMANT GUPTA, J (ORAL)
As per the affidavit filed on behalf of respondent, petitioners have been paid the difference of special allowance @ Rs. 400/- per month.
In view of the said fact, no further orders are called for in the present contempt petition. Consequently, the same is disposed of as having
been rendered infrucutous.
(HEMANT GUPTA) JUDGE
25.10.2010 preeti
Hari Chand and another
Sh. K.B.S. Sidhu, IAS
HEMANT GUPTA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
