The High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissed the application, which was withdrawn by the learning counsel for the petitioner with liberty to challenge the order in proper forum.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
C.O.C.P. No.756 of 2010 (O&M) Date of Decision:15.10.2010
Surender Kumar
.....Applicant
Vs.
Mool Chand Yadav
.....Respondent
CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA
Present:Mr. S.K. Yadav, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Aman Chaudhary, Additional Advocate General, Haryana.
Hemant Gupta, J.
Short reply by way of affidavit on behalf of the respondent filed today in Court is taken on record.
Learned counsel for the petitioner wishes to withdraw the present petition with liberty to challenge the order passed in accordance with law in proper forum.
Dismissed as withdrawn.
October 15, 2010 renu
( HEMANT GUPTA ) JUDGE
Surender Kumar
Mool Chand Yadav
Hemant Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
