In this oral contempt petition, the court held that the matter was rendered infructuous due to a subsequent order by the Letters Patent Bench and disposed of the petition accordingly.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Date of Decision : 26.10.2010
COCP No.1354 of 2010
Jatinder Kumar
...Petitioner
Versus
Risal Singh Khara
...Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA
Present: Mr. N.D.Achint, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Sidharth Batra, Advocate, for the respondent.
HEMANT GUPTA, J. (Oral)
Mr. Batra has produced a copy of the order passed by the Letters Patent Bench on 06.10.2010.
In view of the said order, the present contempt petition is rendered infructuous. The same is disposed of as such.
26.10.2010 (HEMANT GUPTA) Vimal JUDGE
Jatinder Kumar
Risal Singh Khara
Hemant Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
