Allowed

Yashpal Walia and Anr. v. State of Punjab and Anr.

Punjab & Haryana HC12 May 2009RFA/3242/2008

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Counsel for both parties agreed the appeal is covered by the Randhir Singh judgment. The court allowed the application to fix the case for final hearing and disposed of the main appeal relying on the prior decision. Relief granted includes regular board fixation.

What did the court decide?

Application allowed; main appeal disposed of relying on Randhir Singh judgment; case fixed for regular board.

Yashpal Walia and Anr. Vs State of… — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Punjab & Haryana HC (2009)

¶1

CM Nos.6175 & 6176-CI-2009 in RFA No.3242 of 2008

¶2

- 1 -

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

¶4

****

¶5

CM Nos.6175 & 6176-CI-2009 in RFA No.3242 of 2008

¶6

DATE OF DECISION: 12.05.2009

¶7

¶8

Yashpal Walia and another

¶9

. . . . Appellants

¶10

VS.

¶11

State of Punjab through Secretary, Irrigation & Power Govt. of Punjab, Chandigarh and another

¶12

. . . . Respondents

¶13

¶14

CORAM : HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR JAIN

¶15

¶16

Present: Mr.Amandeep Singh Saini, Advocate for the appellant.

¶17

Mr.N.S. Pawar, Addl. A.G. Punjab for respondent No.1. Mr.H.S. Garewal, Advocate for respondent No.2.

¶18

¶19

RAKESH KUMAR JAIN J.(ORAL)

¶20

CM No.6175-CI-2009

¶21

Allowed as prayed for.

¶22

CM No.6176-CI-2009

¶23

This is an application filed under Section 151 CPC with the prayer for fixing the case for final hearing on the ground that the appeal is covered by the judgment of this court in the case RFA No.1920 of 2002 titled as “Randhir Singh and others Vs. Punjab

¶24

State Electricity Board, Patiala and others” decided on 26.3.2008

¶25

by Hon’ble Mrs. Justice Nirmal Yadav.

¶26

CM Nos.6175 & 6176-CI-2009 in RFA No.3242 of 2008

¶27

- 2 -

¶28

This fact is not disputed by both the learned counsel for the respondents. Therefore, the application is allowed and the main appeal is ordered to be taken on regular board.

¶29

CM stands disposed of.

¶30

MAIN CASE

¶31

Both the parties are ad idem that the present appeal is squarely covered by the decision of this Court in RFA No.1920 of 2002 titled as “Randhir Singh and others Vs. Punjab State Electricity Board, Patiala and others” decided on 26.3.2008 by Hon’ble Mrs. Justice Nirmal Yadav.

¶32

In view of the above, the present appeal is also disposed of in terms of the decision of this court in RFA No.1920 of 2002 titled as “Randhir Singh and others Vs. Punjab State Electricity Board, Patiala and others” decided on 26.3.2008 by Hon’ble Mrs. Justice Nirmal Yadav.

¶33

(RAKESH KUMAR JAIN) MAY 12, 2009 JUDGE vivek

Yashpal Walia and Anr. v. State of Punjab and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Yashpal Walia and Anr. v. State of Punjab and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

(O&M)Puran Chand Ramesh Kumar Vs Shanker Gram Udyog and Anr.

Ashwani Kumar Vs Amir Chand and Others

Union of India Vs Rajinder Singh and Ors.

Karan Singh & Ors. Vs St.of Hry. & Anr.

Surjeet Vs Hari Chand

Mangal Singh and Others Vs Union of India and Others