Surjeet v. Hari Chand
Case brief
What is this about?
Appellant challenged a compensation order for a 10% disability, arguing his age was misrecorded at 32 instead of 26.缺乏证据支持的上诉被驳回。
What did the court decide?
Appeal dismissed with no order as to costs.
What the court decided
FAO No.3858 of 2008
-1 -
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
FAO No.3858 of 2008
Date of Decision: 14.5.2009
Surjeet
...Appellant.
Vs.
Hari Chand
...Respondent.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR JAIN
Present : Mr.Ashok Tyagi, Advocate for the appellant.
RAKESH KUMAR JAIN, J.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the appeal to quash the compensation order should be allowed in the absence of evidence regarding the appellant's actual age.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Surjeet
- respondent
Hari Chand
Coram
Rakesh Kumar Jain
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Punjab & Haryana HC
- Decided on
- · May
- Registered
- Case no.
- FAO/3858/2008
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court