The High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissed an appeal as infructuous on the ground that the underlying suit had already been decreed by the trial court.
Appeal dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
FAO No.2168 of 2004
Date of Decision: 11.5.2009
M/s Puran Chand Ramesh Kumar
...Appellant.
Vs.
M/s Shanker Gram Udyog Mandal and another
...Respondents.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR JAIN
Present : Mr.A.P.Bhandari, Advocate for the appellant.
RAKESH KUMAR JAIN, J.(ORAL)
Counsel for the appellant states at the bar that the present appeal has become infructuous because suit before the trial Court has been decreed, therefore, the same be disposed of as such.
Dismissed as infructuous.
(Rakesh Kumar Jain) 11.5.2009 Judge Meenu
M/s Puran Chand Ramesh Kumar
M/s Shanker Gram Udyog Mandal
Rakesh Kumar Jain
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
