The Court disposed of the writ petition by applying legal ratios settled in connected cases, directing respondents to reconsider petitioners' claims regarding specific notifications within five months.
Direction to respondents to consider petitioners' claim regarding specific notifications and pass appropriate orders within 5 months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT
CHANDIGARH.
Civil Writ Petition No. 7664 of 2001
DATE OF DECISION : NOVEMBER 11, 2009
DARSHAN SINGH & ORS.
....... PETITIONER(S)
VERSUS
THE STATE OF PUNJAB & ANR.
.... RESPONDENT(S)
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAI LAMBA
PRESENT: Mr. Salil, Advocate, for the petitioner(s). Mr. OP Dabla, DAG, Punjab.
AJAI LAMBA, J. (Oral)
For the reasons given in judgment of even date passed in CWP 7663 of 2001 (Mehar Singh and others v. The State of Punjab and another), the petition is disposed of with directions to the respondents to consider the claim of the petitioners in regard to their plea in challenge to Notifications dated 24.12.1992 and 8.1.1998. The respondents would be required to consider the ratio as settled by this Court while dealing with CWP 16380 of 1989 (Balbir Singh and others v. State of Punjab etc.) decided on 7.5.2009 and CWP 14264 of 1991 (Harbhajan Singh Dhindsa and others v. The State of Punjab and another), decided on 9.11.2009, and pass appropriate
Civil Writ Petition No. 7664 of 2001
2
orders within a period of 5 months of receipt of certified copy of the order. November 11, 2009 ( AJAI LAMBA) Kang JUDGE
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Darshan Singh & Ors.
The State of Punjab & Anr.
Ajai Lamba
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
