Nachhatar Singh v. State of Punjab and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
Writ petition against non-appointment on regular basis and disciplinary action dismissed as petitioner was not appointed regularly and absented without leave.
Writ petition against non-appointment on regular basis and disciplinary action dismissed as petitioner was not appointed regularly and absented without leave.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT
CHANDIGARH.
Civil Writ Petition No. 17469 of 2008
DATE OF DECISION : NOVEMBER 10, 2009
NACHHATTAR SINGH
....... PETITIONER(S)
VERSUS
STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS.
.... RESPONDENT(S)
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAI LAMBA
PRESENT: Mr. RS Ahluwalia, Advocate, for the petitioner(s). Ms. Charu Tuli, Senior DAG, Punjab.
AJAI LAMBA, J. (Oral)
It is admitted that the petitioner was not appointed on regular basis against a regular post. The petitioner, admittedly, absented without sanctioned leave. In this view of the matter, learned counsel for the petitioner has not been able to make out any ground for judicial review of administrative decision taken by the respondents.
The writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed.
November 10, 2009 ( AJAI LAMBA ) Kang JUDGE
NACHHATTAR SINGH
STATE OF PUNJAB
AJAI LAMBA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court