In a withdrawal order, the Punjab and Haryana High Court dismissed the petitioner's writ petition (CWP No. 18653 of 2007) which was withdrawn without prejudice to the petitioner's right to avail other remedies.
The petition was dismissed as withdrawn without prejudice to the petitioner's right to avail other remedies.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
C.W.P. No.18653 of 2007
DATE OF DECISION: AUGUST 18, 2009
Baldev Singh
.....PETITIONER
Versus
Punjab State Tubewell Corporation Ltd.,Chandigarh and others
....RESPONDENTS
CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SATISH KUMAR MITTAL
Present: Mr.Rajesh K.Dadwal, , Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr.Amit Singh Sethi, Advocate, for the respondents.
SATISH KUMAR MITTAL, J. (Oral)
After arguing for some time, counsel for the petitioner wants to withdraw this petition without prejudice to the right of the petitioner to avail other remedies, if available under the law.
Dismissed as withdrawn.
August 18, 2009 (SATISH KUMAR MITTAL) vkg JUDGE
Baldev Singh
Punjab State Tubewell Corporation Ltd.
Satish Kumar Mittal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
