Disposed

Ramesh Kumar and Ors. v. State of Haryana and Ors.

Punjab & Haryana HC13 Jul 2009CWP/10175/2009

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioners sought directions to the respondent to consider their representation for cadre change from fire staff to Accountant/Mandi Supervisor/Auction Recorder. The court directed the respondent No. 2 to decide the representation expeditiously within three months without issuing notice of motion.

What did the court decide?

Direction to respondent No.2 to consider and decide the representation dated 22.5.2009 expeditiously within three months.

Ramesh Kumar and Ors. Vs State of Haryana… — Service and Employment | Punjab & Haryana HC (2009)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH.

¶2

C.W.P. No. 10175 of 2009

¶3

DATE OF DECISION : 13.07.2009

¶4

Ramesh Kumar and others

¶5

.... PETITIONERS

¶6

Versus

¶7

State of Haryana and others

¶8

..... RESPONDENTS

¶9

CORAM :- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SATISH KUMAR MITTAL

¶10

Present: Mr. N.S. Bhinder, Advocate, for the petitioners.

¶11

¶12

SATISH KUMAR MITTAL , J. ( Oral )

¶13

The petitioners, who are working as Assistant Fire Station Officers, Firemen, Leading Firemen and Driver Operators, in various Market Committees under the Haryana State Agricultural Marketing Board, have filed this petition for quashing the advertisements No. 14/2007 dated 9.11.2007 (Annexure P-4), 1/2009 dated 10.1.2009 (Annexure P-5) and the corrigendum (Annexure P-6), published on 3.2.2009 in the daily news paper `The Tribune, Chandigarh' in respect of posts of Accountant, Mandi Supervisor and Auction Recorder.

¶14

It is the case of the petitioners that they had filed a representation dated 22.5.2009, copy of which has been annexed as Annexure P-3, for change of their cadre of Fire Staff under Rule 21 of the

¶15

CWP No. 10175 of 2009

¶16

-2-

¶17

Haryana State Agricultural Marketing Board Service Rules, 2008, but the said representation has not been considered and decided so far. In the said representation, the petitioners have stated that their cadre should be changed and they should be absorbed in the cadre of Accountant, Mandi Supervisor and Auction Recorder. They further state that if their cadre is changed, they are ready to loose their seniority also.

¶18

In view of the above, after hearing counsel for the petitioners, without issuing notice of motion to the respondents, as it will un-necessary delay the matter, this petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.2 to consider and decide the representation dated 22.5.2009 (Annexure P-3), in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a period of

¶19

three months.

¶20

July 13, 2009 ndj

¶21

( SATISH KUMAR MITTAL ) JUDGE

Ramesh Kumar and Ors. v. State of Haryana and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ramesh Kumar and Ors. v. State of Haryana and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Tabir-Ul-Haq Vs State of Punjab

Karam Chand Vs State of Haryana and Ors.

Kulwant Singh Vs National Insurance Company Limited & Others

Brij Pal Sharma Vs State of Haryana & Anr.

Kuldeep Singh Vs State of Punjab and Ors.

Dropti Bajaj Vs State of Punjab & Ors.