A criminal miscellaneous petition was dismissed as infructuous because the petitioner had already been arrested in the case, with no arguments heard.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CRM No. M-33748 of 2008 1
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH.
CRM No. M-33748 of 2008 (O&M) Date of decision: 15.4.2009
Preet
...Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab
...Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJAN GUPTA
Present: None for the petitioner. Mr. Shailesh Gupta, DAG, Punjab.
Rajan Gupta, J.
Learned counsel for the State (on the instructions from ASI
Raghbir Singh, who is present in Court) submits that this petition has been rendered infructuous as the petitioner has already been arrested in this case.
In view of the statement made by the learned State counsel, this petition is dismissed as infructuous.
(RAJAN GUPTA) JUDGE
April 15, 2009 'rajpal'
Preet
State of Punjab
RAJAN GUPTA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
