Dismissed
Vijay Kumar v. State of Punjab and Anr.
Punjab & Haryana HCCRM-M/1689/2009
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
M-1689 of 2009 1 IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE…
What the court decided
AI extract
M-1689 of 2009 1 IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CRM No. M-1689 of 2009 1
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH.
CRM No. M-1689 of 2009 (O&M) Date of decision: 15.4.2009
Vijay Kumar
...Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab and another
...Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJAN GUPTA
Present: Mr. Naresh Gopal Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Rajan Gupta, J.
Learned counsel for the petitioner states that he be allowed
to withdraw the present petition with liberty to file a fresh one with better particulars on the basis of compromise arrived at between the parties.
In view of the statement made by learned counsel for the petitioner, this petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty as aforesaid.
(RAJAN GUPTA) JUDGE April 15, 2009 'rajpal'
Vijay Kumar
State of Punjab
Rajan Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court