In Crl. Misc. No. M-2222 of 2009, the single judge made an interim anticipatory bail order absolute for the petitioner, who had already joined the investigation, subject to conditions under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C.
The order granting ad-interim anticipatory bail was made absolute, subject to conditions under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Crl. Misc No. M-2222 of 2009 Date of decision : 02.04.2009
Rakesh Kumar @ Titoo Pardhan
....Petitioner
V/s
State of Punjab
....Respondent.
BEFORE : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJAN GUPTA
Present: Mr. Anil Kumar Lamdharia, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Shailesh Gupta, DAG Punjab.
RAJAN GUPTA J. (ORAL)
Counsel for the State on instructions from ASI Jaswinder Singh, who is present in Court, submits that pursuant to order dated 30.01.2009, petitioner has already joined the investigation and is no longer required for custodial interrogation.
Under these circumstances, order dated 30.01.2009, passed by this Court, granting ad-interim anticipatory bail to the petitioner is hereby made absolute, subject to the conditions as envisaged under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C.
02.04.2009 Ajay
(RAJAN GUPTA) JUDGE
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the ad-interim anticipatory bail granted to the petitioner should be made absolute on the condition that he joins the investigation.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Rakesh Kumar @ Titoo Pardhan
State of Punjab
RAJAN GUPTA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
