Petitioner sought permission to withdraw the present petition with liberty to file a fresh one. The High Court of Punjab and Haryana allowed the withdrawal.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file a fresh one.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM No. M 32411 of 2008 Date of decision: 04.03.2009
Teja Ram
...Petitioner
Versus
State of Haryana and others
...Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE HARBANS LAL
Present: Mr.Krishan Singh, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr.Tarunveer Vashist, Addl. A.G., Haryana
Harbans Lal, J.
After arguing for some time, the learned counsel for the petitioner states that he may be permitted to withdraw the present petition with a liberty to file fresh one.
In view of the statement made above, the instant petition is dismissed as withdrawn with aforesaid liberty.
March 04, 2009 ( Harbans Lal ) amrit Judge
Teja Ram
State of Haryana
Harbans Lal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
