The petitioners filed a reply stating that a compromise had been entered between the parties and they did not wish to pursue the matter further. The High Court, finding this satisfactory, disposed of the petition without further adjudication.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM No.M 2516 of 2009 Date of decision: 03.03.2009
Daljit Kaur and another
...Petitioners
Versus
State of Punjab and others
...Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE HARBANS LAL
Present: Mr.G.S.Sandhu, Advocate for the petitioners.
Mr.T.S.Salana, DAG, Punjab.
Mr.Ravinder Singh-respondent No.4 in person.
Harbans Lal, J
Reply filed by State is taken on record.
The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the parties
have entered into compromise and that being so, he does not want to pursue this petitioner any further.
Disposed of accordingly.
March 3, 2009 ( Harbans Lal ) amrit Judge
Daljit Kaur
State of Punjab
Harbans Lal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
