Rattan Kaur v. State of Punjab & Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
A petition became infructuous as the challan was presented in the Court. The High Court dismissed the petition accordingly.
A petition became infructuous as the challan was presented in the Court. The High Court dismissed the petition accordingly.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM . No. M 31253 of 2008 ( O & M) Date of decision: 05 .03.2009
Rattan Kaur
...Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab and others
...Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE HARBANS LAL
Present: Mr.Jatinder Singh, Advocate for Mr.S.S.Majithia, Advocate for the applicant- petitioner.
Mr.T.S.Salana, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab.
Harbans Lal, J.
The learned State counsel submits that this petition has become
infructuous as the challan has been presented in the Court.
Dismissed as having become infructuous.
March 05 , 2009 (Harbans Lal) amrit Judge
Rattan Kaur
State of Punjab
Harbans Lal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court