COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH…
Plea for exemption from personal appearance to be favourably considered by the Trial Court; Trial Court retains discretion.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Crl. Misc. No. M-29227 of 2009 Date of Decision: November 17, 2009
Ram Kishan
… Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab and another
… Respondents
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE S.D. ANAND
Present : Mr. C.M.Munjal, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. BBS Teji, AAG, Punjab.
Mr. K.S.Sidhu, Advocate, for respondent No.2. ******
S.D. Anand, J.
Dismissed as withdrawn.
However, if the petitioner files a plea for exemption from his personal appearance, it shall be favourably considered by the learned Trial Court. However, the Trial Court shall be entitled to pass orders for his personal appearance whatever it deems fit, completely un-fazed by the present order.
November 17, 2009 ( S.D. Anand ) vinod Judge
Ram Kishan
State of Punjab
S.D. Anand
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
