The Court permitted the counsel for the petitioners to withdraw the criminal miscellaneous petition without recording reasons or issuing any further orders on the merits of the matter.
Permission to withdraw the petition granted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Crl. Misc. No. M-20952 of 2008 Date of Decision: November 17, 2009
Rajender Singh and another … Petitioners
Versus
State of Haryana and another
… Respondents
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE S.D. ANAND
Present : Mr. Deepak Aggarwal, Advocate, for the petitioners.
Mr. BBS Teji, AAG, Punjab.
S.D. Anand, J.
Learned counsel for the petitioners states that he may
be allowed to withdraw this petition.
Ordered accordingly.
November 17, 2009 ( S.D. Anand ) vinod Judge
Rajender Singh
another
State of Haryana
another
S.D. Anand
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
