Single-judge oral order where the petitioner chose not to press the petition. The court dismissed the petition but directed the trial court to expedite the trial.
Petition dismissed; trial court directed to expedite trial.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Crl.M. No. M-28322 of 2008 Date of decision : 8.1.2009.
Satnam Ram
................ petitioner
vs.
State of Punjab
.................Respondent
Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice K.C. Puri
Present: Sh. Vikas Bahl, Advocate
for the petitioner.
Sh. K.S. Pannu, Assistant Advocate General, Punjab.
K.C. Puri, J. (Oral)
Learned counsel for the petitioner does not want to press the
petition at this stage.
The petition stands dismissed as not pressed.
However, the trial Court is directed to expedite the trial.
( K.C. Puri ) 8.1.2009. Judge chug
Satnam Ram
State of Punjab
K.C. Puri
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
