Ashok Mudgil and Anr. v. State of Haryana
Case brief
What is this about?
This oral order dismissed an application for anticipatory bail after petitioners failed to deposit Rs.13.5 lacs within four weeks as ordered in a previous judgment dated 1.8.2008. The court withdrew the application due to the seriousness of allegations in the FIR. The court affirmed the dismissal.
What did the court decide?
Application for grant of anticipatory bail was dismissed due to non-deposit of security.