In a criminal matter where the underlying FIR was previously quashed, the High Court dismissed the present petition as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Crl.M. No. M-23184 of 2008 Date of decision : 15.1.2009.
Ravinder Singh @ Binderjit Singh
................ Petitioner
vs.
State of Punjab
.................Respondent
Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice K.C. Puri
Present: Sh. I.S. Brar, Advocate for the petitioner.
Sh. K.S. Pannu, Assistant Advocate General, Punjab.
Sh. S.K. Bawa, Advocate for the complainant
K.C. Puri, J. (Oral)
Since the FIR has been quashed, so the present petition
stands dismissed as having become infructuous.
15.1.2009. chug
( K.C. Puri ) Judge
Ravinder Singh @ Binderjit Singh
State of Punjab
K.C. Puri
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
