Petitioner withdrew the criminal miscellaneous petition with liberty to challenge the charge framing order before the Sessions Judge; petition dismissed.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to challenge the order of framing of charge before the Sessions Judge.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Crl.M. No. M-1028 of 2009 Date of decision : 14.1.2009.
Anu Vikas
................ Petitioner
vs.
State of Haryana and another
.................Respondent
Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice K.C. Puri
Present: Sh. Vikas Chatrath, Advocate for the petitioner.
K.C. Puri, J. (Oral)
Learned counsel for the petitioner wants to withdraw the petition with liberty to challenge the order of framing of charge before the Sessions Judge.
The petition stands dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty.
( K.C. Puri ) 14.1.2009. Judge chug
Anu Vikas
State of Haryana
K.C. Puri
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
