Dismissed
Rohit Sharma and Anr. v. U.T.Chandigarh and Ors.
Punjab & Haryana HCCRM-M/20002/2009
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH…
What the court decided
AI extract
COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Crl. Misc. No. M-20002 of 2009 (O&M) Date of Decision: October 22, 2008
Rohit Sharma and another
… Petitioners
Versus
U.T.Chandigarh and others … Respondents
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE S.D. ANAND
Present : Mr. Vikas Sagar, Advocate, for the petitioners.
Mr. Preetpal Singh, Addl. Public Prosecutor, for UT, Chandigarh.
S.D. Anand, J.
Learned counsel for the petitioners states that this
petition may be dismissed as infructuous.
Dismissed as infructuous accordingly.
October 22, 2009 ( S.D. Anand ) vinod Judge
Rohit Sharma and another
U.T. Chandigarh and others
S.D. Anand
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court