Thin order disposing of M-13577/09. The court accepted that a final police report under Section 173 Cr.P.C. had been filed, holding no cause of action subsisted for adjudication.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Crl. Misc. No. M-13577 of 2009 Date of Decision: October 22, 2009
Jalbir Singh
… Petitioner
Versus
State of Haryana and others … Respondents
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE S.D. ANAND
Present : Mr. R.S.Budhwar, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mrs. Neena Madan, Addl. A.G., Haryana.
S.D. Anand, J.
Short reply filed on behalf of respondent Nos.1 to 3,
presented in the Court today, is taken on record.
There is a precise averment, in the course thereof, that report under Section 173 Cr.P.C., in this case, has been filed. This completely satisfies the learned counsel for the petitioner.
In the light thereof, no cause of action subsists for adjudication.
Disposed of accordingly.
October 22, 2009 ( S.D. Anand ) vinod Judge
Jalbir Singh
State of Haryana
S.D. Anand
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
