The High Court dismissed the Crl. Misc. petition as infructuous. No substantive legal proposition is laid down.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Crl. Misc. No.M-12359 of 2009 Date of decision:18.11.2009.
Sunil Bindal
...Petitioner
Versus
Anil Kumar and another …Respondents
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE S.D.ANAND.
Present: Mr. R.S.Sihota, Senior Advocate, with Mr. B.R.Rana, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Hemant Bassi, Advocate, for respondent No.1.
Mr. S.S.Pattar, Sr. DAG, Haryana.
S.D.ANAND, J.
Learned Senior counsel appearing on behalf of the
petitioner states that this petition may be dismissed as infructuous.
Ordered accordingly.
November 18, 2009 (S.D.ANAND) vinod* JUDGE
Sunil Bindal
Anil Kumar
another
S.D. Anand
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
