Petitioners' application dismissed as infructuous due to pending police plea for FIR cancellation.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Crl. Misc. No.M-10845 of 2008 Date of decision:18.11.2009.
Anil and others
...Petitioners
Versus
Shikha Gupta …Respondent
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE S.D.ANAND.
Present: Mr. Jagjit Gill, Advocate, for the petitioners.
Mr. Hemant Bassi, Advocate, for the respondent. *****
S.D.ANAND, J.
Learned counsel for the petitioner states that this petition may be dismissed as infructuous as the police have already moved a plea for cancellation of the FIR itself.
Ordered accordingly.
November 18, 2009 (S.D.ANAND) vinod* JUDGE
Anil and others
Shikha Gupta
S.D.ANAND
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
