The High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissed the writ petition as infructuous after the petitioner provided security, while directing the State to furnish security as required in the future.
Writ petition disposed of as infructuous; State directed to furnish security as required.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh
C.W.P.No.3378 of 2008 Date of Decision:05--05-2008
Mohinder Dass
---Petitioner
vs.
State of Punjab and others
---Respondents
Coram: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M.KUMAR HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SABINA
Present: Mr. S.K.Laddi, Advocate, for the petitioner
Mr.Suvir Sehgal, Addl.AG. Punjab Mr. J.S.Brar, Advocate, for respondent No. 6.
M.M.KUMAR, J.
Learned counsel for the petitioner states that security has been provided to the petitioner and the instant petition may be disposed of as having been rendered infructuous.
Writ petition is disposed of as having been rendered infructuous. However, we make it clear that Statel shall keep on furnishing security to the petitioner as and when required.
(M.M.KUMAR)
JUDGE
(SABINA) JUDGE
May 05, 2008 paramjit
Mohinder Dass
State of Punjab
M.M.KUMAR
SABINA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
