The High Court of Punjab & Haryana issued a direction to the respondent in this CWP to decide the legal notice served by the petitioner within four months. The writ petition was disposed of with this specific direction.
Direction to respondent No.2 to decide the legal notice within four months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CWP No.12460 of 2008 1
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH.
CWP No.12460 of 2008 (O&M) Date of decision: 4.9.2008
Dr. Pardeep Blaggan
..Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab & others
...Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH MOHUNTA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJAN GUPTA
Present: Mr. Vivek Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Ashutosh Mohunta, J. (oral)
The relief claimed by the petitioner in this writ petition has also been claimed by him by serving a legal notice (Annexure P-4) upon the respondents which has not been decided till date.
After hearing learned counsel for the petitioner, we dispose of this writ petition with a direction to respondent No.2 to decide the legal notice (Annexure P-4) within a period of four months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order.
(ASHUTOSH MOHUNTA) JUDGE
(RAJAN GUPTA) JUDGE
September 04, 2008 'rajpal'
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the respondent's legal notice should be decided within a specified period.
Dr. Pardeep Blaggan
State of Punjab & others
Ashutosh Mohunta
Rajan Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
