In C.W.P. No.17952 of 2006, Justice Viney Mittal held that no further orders were required as detailed orders had been passed in a related matter (CWP No.15433 of 2006, Amar Singh Vs. HUDA and others) decided on November 29, 2006. The matter was disposed of accordingly.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
C.W.P NO.17952 OF 2006
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Date of decision : December 04, 2006
Tilak Raj and another
Vs.
State of Haryana and others ...........Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINEY MITTAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.S BHALLA
Present: Mr. Ram Pal, Advocate for Mr. Manoj Bajaj, Advocate for the petitioner(s).
Mr. A.K Walia, Advocate for respondents no. 2 & 3.
Viney Mittal, J. (Oral)
In view of the detailed orders passed in CWP No.15433 of 2006 decided on November 29, 2006 (Amar Singh Vs. HUDA and others), no further orders are required in this case.
Disposed of accordingly.
( VINEY MITTAL ) JUDGE
December 04, 2006 ( H.S BHALLA ) ritu JUDGE
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Amar Singh Vs. HUDA and othersReferred¶12
Amar Singh Vs. HUDA and others
Tilak Raj and another
State of Haryana and others
Viney Mittal
H. S. Bhalla
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
