Disposed

Gautam and Anr. v. Guru Nanak Dev University and Ors.

Punjab & Haryana HC1 Dec 2006CWP/18500/2006

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioners sought directions to condone attendance shortage and allow final exams. The court granted liberty to file a detailed representation with the University to decide condonation of lectures within one week.

What did the court decide?

Liberty to file a detailed representation to the University within seven days to decide on condonation of lectures within one week.

Gautam and Anr. Vs Guru Nanak Dev… — Education and Admissions | Punjab & Haryana HC (2006)

¶1

C.W.P NO.18500 OF 2006

¶2

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

¶4

Date of decision : December 01, 2006

¶5

Gautam and another ............Petitioner

¶6

Vs.

¶7

Guru Nanak Dev University, Amritsar ...........Respondents

¶8

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINEY MITTAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.S BHALLA

¶9

Present: Mr. Rohit Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner(s). Mr. D.S Patwalia, Advocate for respondents no. 1 & 2. Mr. R.S Bajaj, Advocate for respondents no. 3 & 4.

¶10

¶11

Viney Mittal, J. (Oral)

¶12

The petitioners have approached this Court for issuance of direction to the respondents to allow them to attend classes, condone their attendance shortage and allow them to appear for the final exams of the 5^th Semester of the B.A.LL.B. Course being offered by the Lovely Institute of Law, Phagwara.

¶13

During the course of the arguments, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners states that the petitioners would be satisfied if the directions are issued to the Guru Nanak Dev University, Amritsarrespondent no.1 to consider the claim of the petitioners for condonation of lectures. Learned cousnel specifically states that petitioners would not press their claim for migration which, at one stage, had been made by them before

¶14

C.W.P NO.18500 OF 2006

¶15

¶16

the respondent-University.

¶17

Learned counsel appearing for the respondents have no objection to this limited prayer of the petitioners being allowed.

¶18

Consequently, we dispose of the present petition with a liberty to the petitioners to file a detailed and comprehensive representation before the Registrar, Guru Nanak Dev University, Amritsar-respondnet no.1 within a period of seven days from the date a copy of this order is received. On receipt of the aforesaid representation, the competent authority of the University may take an appropriate decision as expeditiously as possible and in any case within a period of one week from the date of filing of the aforesaid representation, in accordance with law, keeping in view the fact that the career of the petitioners is also involved.

¶19

Copy of this order be given under the signatures of the Special Secretary attached to this Court.

¶20

( VINEY MITTAL ) JUDGE

¶21

December 01, 2006 ( H.S BHALLA ) ritu JUDGE

Gautam and Anr. v. Guru Nanak Dev University and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Gautam and Anr. v. Guru Nanak Dev University and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Kalawanti Vs HUDA and Another

Sahil Mittal Vs Baba Farid University and Ors.

Pooja Sharma Vs Chandigarh Housing Board and Ors.

Tej Singh Nagra Vs Union of India and Anr.

Basanti Devi Vs HUDA and Ors.

All India L P G Distributors Vs State of Haryana and Others