This court disposed of the writ petition without passing a separate order on the ground that a detailed order was already passed in a connected matter decided earlier on November 29, 2006.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP NO.19020 of 2006
DATE OF DECISION: December 1, 2006
Basanti Devi
….Petitioner
VERSUS
Haryana Urban Development Authority and others
Respondents
CORAM:- HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE VINEY MITTAL HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE H.S. BHALLA
PRESENT: Ms.Anita Balyan, Advocate for the petitioner. Viney Mittal,J.(Oral).
In view of the detailed orders passed in CWP No.15433 of 2006 decided on November 29,2006 (Amar Singh v. HUDA and others), no further orders are required in this case.
Disposed of accordingly.
(Viney Mittal) Judge
December 1, 2006 (H.S. Bhalla) KD Judge
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Amar Singh v. HUDA and othersReferred¶11
CWP No.15433 of 2006
Basanti Devi
Haryana Urban Development Authority
Viney Mittal
H.S. Bhalla
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
