Restoration of Second Appeal No. 226 of 2005 to its original file after failure to remove defects in time. Petitioner permitted to file requisites.
Second Appeal No. 226 of 2005 restored to original file; petitioner at liberty to file requisites.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.3685 of 2018
In
SECOND APPEAL No.226 of 2005
======================================================
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
Patna High Court MJC No.3685 of 2018(10) dt.13-08-2026 2/4
Patna High Court MJC No.3685 of 2018(10) dt.13-08-2026 3/4
Manoharpur, Post-Rajpur, POlice Station-Bihpur, District-Bhagalpur
... ... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Swati Mishra, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Ashok Kumar Yadav, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJIT KUMAR ORAL ORDER
10 13-08-2026
Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned counsel for the respondents & O.P. No. 9.1.
05 & 06 as pointed out by the Stamp Reporter were directed to be removed within a period of four weeks from the date of passing of the order failing which the appeal was directed to be rejected without further reference to the petitioner, since the time so allowed for removal, within which the said defect could not be removed, owing to which the Second Appeal No. 226 of 2005 stood dismissed.
Patna High Court MJC No.3685 of 2018(10) dt.13-08-2026 4/4
disposed of in above terms.
(Ajit Kumar, J)
surya/-
U
Balram Chaudhary
Santosh Choudhary
Ajit Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
