Petitioner sought withdrawal of the writ application as grievances were redressed during pendency. The Single Judge dismissed the application as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.3916 of 2025
======================================================
Subhash Chandra Jha
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Raja Ram Mishra, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Ramadhan Singh, GP (25) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJIT KUMAR ORAL ORDER
2 07-08-2026
counsel for the State.
that during pendency of the instant writ application, the grievances/claim of the petitioner have been redressed and the relief sought by the petitioner has already been complied with, hence he prays for withdrawal of the case.
(Ajit Kumar, J)
rajan/-
U
Subhash Chandra Jha
The State of Bihar
Ajit Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
