Dismissed¶23

Manish Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC24 Apr 2026CR. MISC./17291/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Keywords: anticipatory bail dismissed; Manish Kumar; CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.17291 of 2026; Patna High Court; decided 24-04-2026; Justice Sandeep Kumar; Vaishali (Belsar O.P.) P.S. Case No. 817 of 2025; Sections 309(4) and 3(5) Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita; Section 27 Arms Act; snatching of money; firing at petrol pump employee; two criminal antecedents; name surfaced during investigation; surrender within four weeks; regular bail; Senior Superintendent of Police, Muzaffarpur; arrest; Saket Tiwary Advocate; Navin Kumar Pandey APP.

What did the court decide?

Considering the aforesaid facts, this is not a fit case for grant of anticipatory bail. ¶21

Manish Kumar Vs The State of Bihar — Patna HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.17291 of 2026

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-817 Year-2025 Thana- VAISHALI District- Vaishali

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Manish Kumar S/o Late Ratan rai @ Ram Ratan Rai R/o VillageShakrisaraiya, Lukki Nandlalpur, P.S.- Turki, Dist- Muzaffarpur

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance :

¶10

For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Saket Tiwary, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Navin Kumar Pandey, APP ======================================================

¶11

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER

¶12

2 24-04-2026

¶13

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

¶14

A.P.P. for the State.

¶15

The petitioner apprehends arrest in connection with Vaishali (Belsar O.P.) P.S. Case No. 817 of 2025 instituted under Sections 309(4) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

¶16

As per the prosecution case, three accused persons including the petitioner are alleged of snatching money and firing at the employee of the petrol pump.

¶17

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has not assaulted anyone. The name of the petitioner has come during investigation. Petitioner has two criminal antecedents.

¶18

Learned APP for the State has opposed the prayer

¶19

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.17291 of 2026(2) dt.24-04-2026 2/2

¶20

for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

¶21

Considering the aforesaid facts, this is not a fit

¶22

case for grant of anticipatory bail.

¶23

Accordingly, the application stands dismissed.

¶24

The petitioner is directed to surrender within four weeks from today and pray for regular bail, failing which the Senior Superintendent of Police, Muzaffarpur will take all steps for arrest of the petitioner.

¶25

Let a copy of this order be communicated to the Senior Superintendent of Police, Muzaffarpur through FAX or e-mail for its compliance.

¶26

(Sandeep Kumar, J)

¶27

tusharika/-

¶28

U T

Manish Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Manish Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rakesh Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Pradeep Kumar @ Pradip Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Shailesh Kumar @ Pairu Vs The State of Bihar

Satya Narayan Sahni Vs The State of Bihar

Bhola Kumar @ Bhola Singh @ Bherla Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Chandan Kumar Vs The State of Bihar