Disposed¶32

Jagdish Sinha v. The Union Of India and Ors.

Patna HC4 Nov 2025CWJC/20029/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

CWJC No.20029 of 2018, Patna High Court, decided 04-11-2025, Rajiv Roy J.; Jagdish Sinha v. Union of India, State of Bihar, Divisional Commissioner Magadh Division, DM Nawadah, DCLR Rajauli, CO Akbarpur; Bihar Land Tribunal Act 2009 S.9; B.L.T. Case No. 173 of 2018; Bihar Land Tribunal order dt.16.04.2018 dismissing S.9 application and directing petitioner to Civil Court; Divisional Commissioner order dt.30.11.2017; death of sole petitioner; liberty to heirs to move afresh; writ petition disposed; counsel: Alok Kumar @ Alok Kr Shahi, Amrendra Nath Verma Sr. Counsel, Rakesh Kumar Sinha CGC.

What did the court decide?

Liberty granted to the heirs of the deceased sole petitioner to move afresh if they so desire; writ petition disposed of without deciding the substantive dispute. ¶32

Jagdish Sinha Vs The Union Of India and Ors. — Patna HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.20029 of 2018

¶2

======================================================

¶3

Jagdish Sinha son of Late Nand Kishore Singh, resident of VillageKoairibigha, Police Station- Akbarpur, District- Nawadah.

¶4

... ... Petitioner/s

¶5

Versus

¶6

The Union Of India through the Secretary Department of Land Resources, Government of India, New Delhi.

¶7

The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary Land Reforms Dept. Patna, Bihar.

¶8

The Divisional Commissioner, Magadh Division, Gaya.

¶9

¶10

¶11

The District Magistrate, Nawadah.

¶12

The Deputy Collector Land Reforms, Rajauli, Nawadah.

¶13

The Circle Officer, Akbarpur Circle, Rajauli, Nawadah.

¶14

... ... Respondent/s

¶15

======================================================

¶16

Appearance :

¶17

For the Petitioner/s : For the Respondent/s :

¶18

Mr. Alok Kumar @ Alok Kr Shahi, Advocate Mr. Amrendra Nath Verma, Sr. Counsel Mr. Rakesh Kumar Sinha, CGC

¶19

======================================================

¶20

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER

¶21

2 04-11-2025 Heard the parties.

¶22

The petitioner, in the instant writ petition, prays for

¶23

the following reliefs:-

¶24

“i. For quashing of the order

¶25

dated 16.04.2018 passed by the Bihar Land Tribunal, Patna in B.L.T. Case No. 173 of 2018 whereby the application preferred under section 9 of the Bihar Land Tribunal Act, 2009 against the order dated 30.11.2017 passed by the Divisional Commissioner was

¶26

Patna High Court CWJC No.20029 of 2018(2) dt.04-11-2025 2/2

¶27

dismissed and consequently the petitioner was directed to approach the Civil Court for redressal of his grievance;

¶28

ii. And/or for any other reliefs for which the petitioner may be found entitled in the facts and circumstances of the present case.”

¶29

It has informed by the learned counsel for the petitioner that sole petitioner is no more and as such liberty be granted to the heirs if he/she/they want to approach afresh.

¶30

State has no objection.

¶31

Granting liberty to the heirs to move afresh if

¶32

he/she/they so want, as the petitioner is no more, the writ petition stands disposed of.

¶33

(Rajiv Roy, J)

¶34

GAURAV S./- U

Jagdish Sinha v. The Union Of India and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Jagdish Sinha v. The Union Of India and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Gauri Shankar Mishra Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Rajendra Mahto and Anr. Vs The Union Of India and Ors.

Vidya Sagar Lal and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Prabhu Rishidev Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Rameshwar Singh Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Bhikhari Prasad Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.