The petitioners sought and were granted permission to withdraw the writ application. Consequently, the court dismissed the application as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.542 of 2020
======================================================
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
Patna High Court CWJC No.542 of 2020(3) dt.23-09-2024 2/3
... ... Respondent/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Akshansh Ankit For the State : Mrs. Shilpa Singh ( Ga12 ) For the Madarsa Board : Mr. Shahzad Hassan Khan Mr. Md. Aslam Ansari For the Respondent No.5: Mr. Md. Helal Ahmad ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER
3 23-09-2024 Heard the parties.
Patna High Court CWJC No.542 of 2020(3) dt.23-09-2024 3/3
(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J)
shikha/-
U
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioners should be permitted to withdraw their writ application?
Madarsa Islahul Muslemin Araria through its Secretary Matlub Alam
Madarsa Wahadia Izharul Uloom Chanwar through its President Danish Imam
Madarsa Islamiya Faiz-e-Aam Karor Deghli through its Secretary, Md. Yunus
Madarsa Baharul Uloom Mohaniya through its Secretary, Samiur Rahman
Madarsa Noorul Islam Farsadangi through its Secretary, Mohammad Murshid Alam
State of Bihar through Additional Chief Secretary, Education Department
Anjani Kumar Sharan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
