Rajnish Ray v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC11 Sept 2024CR. MISC./65010/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Regular bail granted; Criminal Miscellaneous No.65010 of 2024; Patna High Court; Justice Chandra Prakash Singh; order dated 11-09-2024; Gidha P.S. Case No. 68 of 2024; District Bhojpur; Section 30(a) Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act; 210 litres illicit country-made liquor recovered from Tempo; petitioner in custody since 14.07.2024; bail-bond Rs.20,000 with two sureties of like amount; Court concerned Bhojpur, Ara; application allowed.

What did the court decide?

Regular bail granted: petitioner to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of the learned Court concerned, Bhojpur, Ara, in connection with Gidha P.S. Case No. 68 of 2024. ¶¶22

Rajnish Ray Vs The State of Bihar — Patna HC (2024) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.65010 of 2024

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-68 Year-2024 Thana- Geedha District- Bhojpur

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Rajnish Ray S/O Ram Awadhesh Ray @ Ram Awadesh Roy Resident of Village- Mokhalisa, P.S-. Gidha, District- Bhojpur

¶5

... ... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State of Bihar Patna

¶8

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Dharmesh Kumar Shrivastava For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Ramchandra Sahni ======================================================

¶10

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH

¶11

ORAL ORDER

¶12

2 11-09-2024

¶13

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P for the State.

¶14

2 . The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with Gidha P.S. Case No. 68 of 2024 dated 14.07.2024 registered for the offences punishable u/s 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

¶15

3 . As per the prosecution case, total 210 litres of illicit country made liquor was recovered from the Tempo.

¶16

4 . Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. The petitioner is not the owner of the said vehicle. The petitioner has no concern with the alleged recovery. Nothing has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner.

¶17

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.65010 of 2024(2) dt.11-09-2024 2/2

¶18

The petitioner has clean antecedent as stated in para 3 of the bail petition. The petitioner is in custody since 14.07.2024.

¶19

5 . Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently

¶20

opposed the bail petition of the petitioner.

¶21

6 . Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as well as the period of custody, the petitioner abovenamed, is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court concerned, Bhojpur, Ara in connection with Gidha P.S. Case No. 68 of 2024.

¶22

7 . The application stands allowed.

¶23

(Chandra Prakash Singh, J)

¶24

guddukr/-

¶25

U T

Rajnish Ray v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rajnish Ray v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rishabh Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Ramashankar Pandit Vs The State of Bihar

Rahul Kumar @ Rahul Kumar Sah @ Rahul Sah Vs the State of Bihar

Rahul Roushan @ Rahul Raushan Vs The State of Bihar

Kundan Kumar @ Dabloo @ Dablu Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Raja Kumar Vs The State of Bihar