Allowed

Rahul Roushan @ Rahul Raushan v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC11 Sept 2024CR. MISC./64921/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Regular bail application in an Excise PS Patna case involving recovery of 398 litres of illicit liquor from a shop. The court, considering the facts and period of custody, enlarged the petitioner on bail on furnishing a bail bond with two sureties.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner enlarged on bail on bond of Rs.20,000/- with two sureties of like amount to the satisfaction of the concerned court, Patna.

Rahul Roushan @ Rahul Raushan Vs The State of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2024)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.64921 of 2024

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-1467 Year-2024 Thana- Excise P.S. District- Patna

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Rahul Roushan @ Rahul Raushan son of Dev Nandan Prasad Singh Resident of mohalla -Bari Patandevi PS -Alamganj District- Patna

¶5

... ... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State of Bihar bihar

¶8

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Arvind Kumar Pradhan For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Pronoti Singh ======================================================

¶10

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH

¶11

ORAL ORDER

¶12

2 11-09-2024

¶13

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

¶14

A.P.P for the State.

¶15

2 . The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with Excise Patna P.S. Case No. 1467 of 2024 dated 20.06.2024 registered for the offences punishable u/s 30(a), 32(1)(3), 36, 41(1)(2) and 56(b) of Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

¶16

3 . As per the prosecution case, total 398 litres of illicit liquor and liquor making apparatus were recovered from the shop.

¶17

4 . Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. The petitioner is not the owner of the said shop. The petitioner has no concern with the alleged recovery rather the recovery has been made from the shop which is accessible to all

¶18

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.64921 of 2024(2) dt.11-09-2024 2/2

¶19

general public. The name of the petitioner has transpired in this case merely on the basis of the suspicion. Nothing has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. The petitioner has one criminal antecedent as stated in para 3 of the bail petition. The petitioner is in custody since 21.06.2024. Similarly situated co-accused has already been granted regular bail by this court vide order dated 04.09.2024 passed in Cr. Misc No. 62120 of 2024.

¶20

5 . Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the bail petition of the petitioner.

¶21

6 . Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as well as the period of custody, the petitioner abovenamed, is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court concerned, Patna in connection with Excise Patna P.S. Case No. 1467 of 2024.

¶22

7 . The application stands allowed.

¶23

(Chandra Prakash Singh, J)

¶24

guddukr/-

¶25

U T

Rahul Roushan @ Rahul Raushan v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rahul Roushan @ Rahul Raushan v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rishabh Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Ramashankar Pandit Vs The State of Bihar

Rahul Kumar @ Rahul Kumar Sah @ Rahul Sah Vs the State of Bihar

Rajnish Ray Vs The State of Bihar

Kundan Kumar @ Dabloo @ Dablu Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Raja Kumar Vs The State of Bihar