Ramashankar Pandit v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC10 Sept 2024CR. MISC./64894/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Regular bail; Cr. MISC. No.64894 of 2024; Patna High Court; Chandra Prakash Singh J.; Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act S. 30(a); Raghunathpur P.S. Case No. 206 of 2024; District Siwan; 85 litres illicit country-made liquor recovered from two plastic sacks; petitioner in custody since 24.07.2024; no criminal antecedent; bail-bond Rs.20,000 with two sureties; application allowed on 10-09-2024.

What did the court decide?

Enlargement of the petitioner on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of the learned Court concerned, Siwan, in connection with Raghunathpur P.S. Case No. 206 of 2024. ¶¶23

Ramashankar Pandit Vs The State of Bihar — Patna HC (2024) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.64894 of 2024

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-206 Year-2024 Thana- RAGHUNATHPUR District- Siwan

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Ramashankar Pandit Son of Late Nagina Pandit Resident of village - Raghunathpur, P.S.- Raghunathpur, District - Siwan.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ajay Kumar Tiwary, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Gauri Shankar Gupta, APP. ======================================================

¶10

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH

¶11

ORAL ORDER

¶12

2 10-09-2024

¶13

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

¶14

A.P.P for the State.

¶15

2. The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with Raghunathpur P.S. Case No. 206 of 2024 dated 31.01.2024 registered for the offences punishable u/s 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

¶16

3. As per the prosecution case, total 85 litres of illicit country made liquor was recovered from two plastic sacks.

¶17

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. The petitioner has no concern with the alleged recovery. The petitioner has no criminal antecedent as stated in para 3 of the bail petition. The petitioner is in custody since

¶18

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.64894 of 2024(2) dt.10-09-2024 2/2

¶19

24.07.2024.

¶20

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently

¶21

opposed the bail petition of the petitioner.

¶22

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as well as the period of custody, the petitioner abovenamed, is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court concerned, Siwan in connection with Raghunathpur P.S. Case No. 206 of 2024.

¶23

7. The application stands allowed.

¶24

(Chandra Prakash Singh, J)

¶25

annpurna/-

¶26

U T

Ramashankar Pandit v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ramashankar Pandit v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rahul Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Pramod Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Dhiraj Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Rishabh Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Rahul Kumar @ Rahul Kumar Sah @ Rahul Sah Vs the State of Bihar

Raushan Kumar Vs the State of Bihar