Dismissed

Nibha Kumari v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Patna HC10 May 2023MJC/254/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Contempt application filed for non-compliance of a previous order. The court noted the petitioner's absence and no representation on the second occasion. An explanation regarding compliance was placed on record. The application was dismissed due to substantial compliance.

What did the court decide?

Application for contempt dismissed as the executive action had substantially complied with the previous order.

Nibha Kumari Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors. — Contempt of Court | Patna HC (2023)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.254 of 2019

¶2

¶3

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.19930 of 2018

¶4

======================================================

¶5

Nibha Kumari, Daughter of Rajendra Singh and w/o of Arun Kumar Singh, R/o Village- Phulwariya Tole Ganour SIngh, P.S- Maker, District- Saran at Chapra

¶6

... ... Petitioner/s

¶7

Versus

¶8

The State Of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Department of Education, Govt. of Bihar namely R.K. Mahajan

¶9

R.K. Mahjan, the Principal Secretary, Department of Education, Government of Bihar, Patna Patna

¶10

Raj kishore Singh, the District Education Officer, Saran Programme Officer (Establishment,) Saran at Chapra

¶11

Avinash Kumar, the Block Development Officer-Cum-Member Secretary, Block Teacher Employment Unit,Maker,Saran at Chapra

¶12

Arvind Kumar Verma, the Director,Primary Eduction, Eduction Department,Govt. of Bihar,Patna

¶13

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶14

======================================================

¶15

Appearance : For the Petitioner : N o n e For the State : Mr. Apurva Kumar, AC to GA-12 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MADHURESH PRASAD ORAL ORDER

¶16

5 10-05-2023 On alleging non-compliance of this Court's order

¶17

dated 28.11.2018 passed in CWJC No. 19930 of 2018, the present contempt application has been filed.

¶18

After due service upon the learned counsel for the petitioner, a supplementary show cause has been filed on 21.01.2020, placing on record decision of the Director, Primary Education dated 22.11.2019, showing consideration of the petitioner’s claim in terms of order passed in C.W.J.C. No.

¶19

Patna High Court MJC No.254 of 2019(5) dt.10-05-2023 2/2

¶20

19930 of 2018.

¶21

Today is the second occasion when there is no

¶22

representation on behalf of the petitioner.

¶23

This Court, in the above circumstances, does not find any reason to keep the contempt proceedings pending.

¶24

In view of substantial compliance having been placed on record, as above, application is dismissed.

¶25

(Madhuresh Prasad, J)

¶26

Sumit/Shashank-

¶27

Nibha Kumari v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Nibha Kumari v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Naulesh Chaudhari @ Nawal Chaudhari Vs The State of Bihar

Sanjeedah Khatoon Vs The State of Bihar

M/s Ariskon Pharma Pvt. Ltd. Vs The State of Bihar

Sudhir Kumar Mahto Vs The State of Bihar

Gopal Prasad Vs The State Of Bihar Through The Chief Secretary, Govt. Of Bihar, Patna.

Laxmi Ravidas Vs The State of Bihar