Writ petition challenging the confiscation and auction of a seized motorcycle. The Court held that notice was duly served and the petitioner had knowledge of the auction, leading to the dismissal of the application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.2545 of 2023
======================================================
Sudhir Kumar Mahto Son of Shiv Kumar Mahto, resident of village and P.O.Haril, P.S. - Mohiuddin Nagar, District - Samastipur.
... ... Petitioner/s
... ... Respondent/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Amit Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Kumar Manish, SC-5 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MADHURESH PRASAD ORAL JUDGMENT (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MADHURESH PRASAD)
Date : 10-05-2023
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.
The petitioner seeks release of his ‘Passion Pro’ motorcycle seized in connection with M. Nagar P.S. Case No. 84 of 2022 on 25.04.2022, for alleged offence under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016 (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Act’).
The prosecution alleges recovery of five (5) litres country made liquor from the vehicle in question.
Patna High Court CWJC No.2545 of 2023 dt.10-05-2023 2/3
The proposal for confiscation of the vehicle in-question was sent by the Superintendent of Police, Samastipur on 05.06.2022 and confiscation proceedings initiated in Confiscation (Excise) Case No. 14 of 2022.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that without any notice to the petitioner, the Authorities have proceeded to confiscate the vehicle and the same has also been auction sold.
Learned counsel for the State, on the other hand, submits that in spite of service of notice, the petitioner did not appear before the Sub-Divisional Officer, Patory in the confiscation proceedings. The Court having regard to this issue regarding disputed service of notice had asked the learned State counsel to produce the records, copy of which has been produced in today’s proceedings. The copy of the peon register available in the record, shows service of the notice upon the petitioner, received by his mother on 10.07.2022. The counter affidavit also contains copy of the notice, which was published in the daily newspaper ‘Danik Jagaran’ on 23.11.2022 regarding auction of confiscated vehicles, including the petitioner’s motorcycle, which is mentioned at serial No. 44 of the paper publication. The petitioner has thus been given an opportunity to participate in the auction.
Patna High Court CWJC No.2545 of 2023 dt.10-05-2023 3/3
This Court, therefore, on bare perusal of the records and on going through the averments made in the counter affidavit is satisfied that notice was issued to the petitioner and duly served. The petitioner also had knowledge of auction of his motorcycle from the paper publication. He, however has taken no steps to participate in the confiscation proceedings or the auction proceedings. The motorcycle has, thus, been auction sold on 06.01.2023 for a consideration of Rs. 61,700/- to a third party.
Facts being so, there is no occasion for this Court to exercise extraordinary discretionary jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.
Accordingly, the writ application stands dismissed.
(K. Vinod Chandran, CJ)
(Madhuresh Prasad, J)
| rajkishore/- | |
|---|---|
| AFR/NAFR | N/A |
| CAV DATE | N/A |
| Uploading Date | 16.05.2023. |
| Transmission Date | N/A |
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the High Court should exercise extraordinary discretionary jurisdiction under Article 226 regarding the auction of the seized motorcycle without considering the petitioner's participation.
Whether the petitioner was served with notice regarding confiscation proceedings and had an opportunity to participate in the auction of the vehicle.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Sudhir Kumar Mahto
The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Department of Excise, Govt. of Bihar, Patna
Madhuresh Prasad
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
