Allowed

M/s Ariskon Pharma Pvt. Ltd. v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC9 May 2023CWJC/3577/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court allowed a writ petition challenging a cancellation of GST registration. The court quashed a non-speaking order issued by the Assessing Officer for lack of reasons and directed reconsideration, noting violations of natural justice.

What did the court decide?

The order dated 04.08.2021 cancelling registration was set aside and the matter was remanded for reconsideration.

M/s Ariskon Pharma Pvt. Ltd. Vs The State of Bihar — Writ and Judicial Review | Patna HC (2023)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.3577 of 2023

¶2

======================================================

¶3

M/s Ariskon Pharma Pvt. Ltd. having its principal place of business Rajbanshi Devi, Wife of Deomuni Ram, Resident of at 4H/9, Part Bahadurpur Housing Colony, Bhut Nath Road, P.S.- Bahadurpur, Patna, Bihar, through its Director Barun Kumar Singh.

¶4

... ... Petitioner/s

¶5

Versus

¶6

The State of Bihar, through its Commissioner, State Tax, State of Bihar, Patna.

¶7

The Additional Commissioner, State Tax (Appeal), West Division, Patna.

¶8

The Joint Commissioner of State Tax, Patna South, Patna.

¶9

The Additional Commissioner (Admin) State Tax, West Division, Patna.

¶10

... ... Respondent/s

¶11

======================================================

¶12

Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rakesh Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Vikash Kumar, SC-11 ======================================================

¶13

CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE

¶14

and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MADHURESH PRASAD ORAL JUDGMENT (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE)

¶15

Date : 09-05-2023

¶16

The petitioner is aggrieved with the cancellation of registration by Annexure- 3, order dated 04.08.2021. An appeal was filed which was delayed, which also stood rejected. Insofar as the Bihar Goods and Services Tax Act is concerned, now there is no Tribunal constituted for the State.

¶17

2. In such circumstances, we have looked at the order at Annexure- 3, especially since the learned counsel for the petitioner has argued that it is a non-speaking order. We see from the order that there is no reason stated as to why the

¶18

Patna High Court CWJC No.3577 of 2023 dt.09-05-2023 2/4

¶19

cancellation was ordered and not even the subject of the notice is referred to in the order.

¶20

3. It is the submission of the learned counsel for the State

¶21

that the form GST REG-19 has been adopted by the Assessing Officer.

¶22

4. We extract form GST REG-19:-

¶23

5. As we see from the Bihar Goods and Services Taxes

¶24

Rules, 2017, GST REG-19 has a specific column where reasons have to be assigned. However, the Assessing Officer seems to be laboring under the belief that when an assessee does not appear or an objection is not filed, no reasons have to be assigned.

¶25

6. We cannot countenance the said order, especially when

¶26

Patna High Court CWJC No.3577 of 2023 dt.09-05-2023 3/4

¶27

there is absolutely no reason stated regarding the cancellation of registration.

¶28

7. We also notice the judgment of another Hon'ble Division Bench of this Court passed in Manoj Kumar Sah versus The State of Bihar and Anr. in C.W.J.C. No. 18307 of 2022, wherein it has been stated so:-

¶29

" It cannot be disputed that with the passing of the said order, petitioner is liable to both civil and penal consequences. To say the least, the authority ought to have at least referred to the contents of the show cause and the response thereto, which was not done. Not only the order is nonspeaking, but cryptic in nature and the reason of cancellation not decipherable therefrom. Principles of natural justice stand violated and the order needs to be quashed as it entails penal and pecuniary consequences. "

¶30

8. The impugned order in the instant writ petition also suffers from the very same illegality which has been pointed out by the Division Bench. In such circumstances, we set aside the order dated 04.08.2021, and direct reconsideration of the issue.

¶31

9. In this context, we also notice that notification No. 3 of 2023 has been brought in by the Central Government on the recommendations of the G.S.T. Council wherein if the cancellation has been effected for failure to file returns under clause (b) or clause (c) of Sub-section (2) of Section 29, there is a further period allowed up to 30.06.2023, wherein the

¶32

Patna High Court CWJC No.3577 of 2023 dt.09-05-2023 4/4

¶33

registered person can apply for revocation of cancellation. This is also subject to the condition that the return should be filed up to the effective date of cancellation of registration and the payment of tax, interest, penalty and late fee in respect of such returns have also been made. The assessee would also be entitled to avail of the said remedy if the cancellation has been effected under clause (b) or clause (c) of Sub-section (2) of Section 29.

¶34

10. The writ petition stands allowed.

¶35

(K. Vinod Chandran, CJ)

¶36

(Madhuresh Prasad, J)

¶37

Raj kishore/-
AFR/NAFR	N/A
CAV DATE	N/A
Uploading Date	11 .05.2023.
Transmission Date	N/A

M/s Ariskon Pharma Pvt. Ltd. v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M/s Ariskon Pharma Pvt. Ltd. v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Archana Devi Vs The State of Bihar

Rahul Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Shiva Sahni Vs The State of Bihar

Naulesh Chaudhari @ Nawal Chaudhari Vs The State of Bihar

Sanjeedah Khatoon Vs The State of Bihar

Raunak Sinha Vs The State of Bihar