Single judge oral order dismissing a miscellaneous application seeking modification of a prior writ order due to non-prosecution as no petitioner appeared.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.1693 of 2016
In
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.8920 of 2014
======================================================
Patna High Court MJC No.1693 of 2016(2) dt.24-07-2023 2/4
Patna High Court MJC No.1693 of 2016(2) dt.24-07-2023 3/4
... ... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : None For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Gyan Prakash Ojha, GA-7 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER
2 24-07-2023 No one appears, on call, on behalf of the petitioner.
The petitioner wants modification of the order dated 17.06.2014 in C.W.J.C No. 8920 of 2014 passed by a bench of
Patna High Court MJC No.1693 of 2016(2) dt.24-07-2023 4/4
this Court (Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jayanandan Singh as his lordships then was).
Lots of water has fallen down in the Ganges.
This is certainly not a fit case for modification of the order as the petitioner could have preferred the said modification in time so that the matter could have taken by the same Hon'ble Judge who had passed the order.
However, since no one has appeared on behalf of the petitioner, the petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.
(Rajiv Roy, J)
Ravi/Vikash-
U
Jawahar Yadav and Ors
The State Of Bihar and Ors
Rajiv Roy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
