Allowed

Manish Gope @ Manish Kumar Yadav @ Manish Yadav v. the State of Bihar

Patna HC21 Jul 2023CR. MISC./40830/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This order grants bail to the petitioner, an accused in a prohibition case where 160 litres of wine were seized from his house but not found on his person. The court extended bail, subject to specific conditions regarding attendance and conduct.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner to be released on bail by furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties, subject to conditions of attendance and conduct.

Manish Gope @ Manish Kumar Yadav @ Manish Yadav Vs the State… — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2023)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.40830 of 2023

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-217 Year-2023 Thana- ALAMGANJ District- Patna

¶3

======================================================

¶4

MANISH GOPE @ MANISH KUMAR YADAV @ MANISH YADAV SON OF LATE JAGDISH YADAV @ JAGDISH GOPE RESIDENT OF MOHALLA - PATHARIGHAT, DEVISTHAN, TRIPOLIYA, POLICE STATION - ALAMGANJ, DISTRICT - PATNA

¶5

... ... Petitioner/s Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR, PATNA ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Raj Krishna Jha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Braj Kishore Pd., APP ======================================================

¶6

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY

¶7

ORAL ORDER

¶8

2 21-07-2023

¶9

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

¶10

The petitioner is an accused in connection with Alamganj P.S. Case No. 217 of 2023 registered for the offences under sections 30(a) and 36 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act lodged on 12.03.2023 by the informant, Dharmendra Kumar.

¶11

As per the prosecution story, the police during patrolling duty came to know about the selling of the wine by the petitioner at Patharighat reached there and chased and arrested one Sandeep Kumar who gave the name of this petitioner and thereafter from the outside the house of this petitioner, 160 litres of country-made wine recovered/seized.

¶12

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.40830 of 2023(2) dt.21-07-2023 2/3

¶13

Accordingly, the FIR.

¶14

Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that it is not a recovery from his house nor from his personal possession and only because he has criminal antecedent, implicated.

¶15

Learned APP for the State, on the other hand, opposes the prayer for bail stating that he has criminal antecedent of same nature.

¶16

Considering the fact that the recovery is not from his house or personal possession, is in custody since 07.04.2023 (as stated in paragraph 6 of the bail application), this Court is inclined to extend him privilege of bail.

¶17

Let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Exclusive Special Court of Excise, Patna City in connection with Alamganj P.S. Case No. 217 of 2023, subject to the following conditions-:

¶18

(i) one of the bailor should be the family member of the petitioner who shall provide official document to show his bona fide ;

¶19

(ii) the petitioner shall appear on each and every date before the Trial court and failure to do so for two consecutive

¶20

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.40830 of 2023(2) dt.21-07-2023 3/3

¶21

dates without plausible reason will entail cancellation of his bail bond by the Trial court itself;

¶22

(iii) the petitioner shall appear before the concerned police station every month for next one year to mark attendance;

¶23

(iv) the petitioner shall in no way try to induce or promise or threat the witnesses or tamper with the evidences, failing which the State shall be at liberty to take steps for cancellation of his bail bonds;

¶24

(v) the petitioner shall desist from committing any criminal offence again failing which the State shall be at liberty to take steps for cancellation of the bail bonds.

¶25

With the aforesaid observations, the bail application is

allowed.

(Rajiv Roy, J)

Neha/-

U T

Manish Gope @ Manish Kumar Yadav @ Manish Yadav v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Manish Gope @ Manish Kumar Yadav @ Manish Yadav v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Birendra Kumar Mishra Vs The Jai Prakash University Chapra, Through Its Registrar Namely and Ors.

Derby Mercantil Pvt. Ltd. Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

M/s Bscpl Infrastructure Ltd. Vs The State of Bihar

Sumit Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Satyendra Kumar Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Manta Yadav Vs The State of Bihar