This is an oral order where the High Court disposed of a writ petition as infructuous. The court noted that the petitioner was absent, and the State counsel informed the court that due to the passage of time, the matter relatable to 2019 was now unworkable.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.24442 of 2019
======================================================
Sunil Kumar S/o Subedar Singh R/o Beni Bigha P.S.- Bikram District Patna.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Respondent/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : None For the Respondent/s : Mr. Raj Ballabh Pd. Yadav (Aag11) ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY
ORAL ORDER
learned counsel for the State is present.
It has been informed by the learned counsel for the State that the matter relates to 2019 and as such, with the passage of time, the same has become infructuous.
Accordingly, the writ petition stands disposed off.
(Rajiv Roy, J)
Jagdish/Jyoti/-
U
Sunil Kumar
The State of Bihar
Rajiv Roy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
