Allowed

Prabhu Narayan Choudhary @ Prabhu Narayan Chaudhari v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC21 Jul 2023CR. MISC./40529/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court at Patna granted bail to the petitioner in a criminal case involving offences under IPC Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 324, 326, 109 and the Arms Act. Considering the injuries were simple in nature and a counter version existed.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail by furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of like amount, subject to specified conditions including fortnightly appearance before the police station for six mont

Prabhu Narayan Choudhary @ Prabhu Narayan Chaudhari Vs The… — Cheque Dishonour | Patna HC (2023)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.40529 of 2023

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-638 Year-2022 Thana- SAMASTIPUR MUFFASIL DistrictSamastipur

¶3

======================================================

¶4

PRABHU NARAYAN CHOUDHARY @ PRABHU NARAYAN CHAUDHARI S/O LATE SATYA NARAYAN CHOUDHARY R/O VillageLaguniya Raghukanth,P.S- Samstipur Muffasil, Distt.- Samastipur.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Aryan Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Shantanu Kumar, APP ======================================================

¶9

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY

¶10

ORAL ORDER

¶11

2 21-07-2023 Heard Mr. Aryan Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner and the State.

¶12

The petitioner is in custody in connection with Samastipur (Muffasil) P.S. Case No. 638 of 2022 for the offence under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 324, 326 and 109 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act lodged on 16.12.2022 by the informant, Gopal Ishwar.

¶13

As per the prosecution story, when the father of the informant was sitting at his door, the accused persons armed variously came and assaulted him. So far as this petitioner is concerned, it is alleged that he assaulted both the informant as also his father. Accordingly, the F.I.R.

¶14

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that though

¶15

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.40529 of 2023(2) dt.21-07-2023 2/3

¶16

allegation of causing injury to the informant and his father has been attributed, the injury report shows the same to be simple in nature.

¶17

Further, there is a counter version to this case also and a Title suit no. 122 of 2022 is pending between the parties.

¶18

The last submission is that he is in custody since 17.12.2022 (as stated in paragraph 13 of the petition).

¶19

Learned APP opposes the prayer stating that there is allegation of assault on both the informant and his father.

¶20

Considering the aforesaid submissions put forward by the learned counsel for the petitioner as also the fact that the injuries have been found to be simple in nature and he is in custody since 17.12.2022, this Court is inclined to extend him the privilege of bail with conditions.

¶21

Let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-II, Samastipur, in connection with Samastipur (Muffasil) P.S. Case No. 638 of 2022 subject to the following conditions:

¶22

(i) one of the bailor should be the family member of the petitioner who shall provide official document to show

¶23

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.40529 of 2023(2) dt.21-07-2023 3/3

¶24

his/her bona fide;

¶25

(ii) the petitioner shall appear on each and every date before the Trial Court and failure to do so for two consecutive dates without plausible reason will entail cancellation of his bail bond by the Trial Court itself;

¶26

(iii) the petitioner shall appear before the concerned police station every fortnight for six months to mark his attendance;

¶27

(iv) the petitioner shall in no way try to induce or promise or threat the witnesses or tamper with the evidences, failing which the State shall be at liberty to take steps for cancellation of the bail bonds;

¶28

(v) the petitioner shall desist from committing any criminal offence again, failing which the State shall be at liberty to take steps for cancellation of his bail bonds.

¶29

With the aforesaid observations, the bail application is

allowed.

(Rajiv Roy, J)

kiran/-

U T

Prabhu Narayan Choudhary @ Prabhu Narayan Chaudhari v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Prabhu Narayan Choudhary @ Prabhu Narayan Chaudhari v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Birendra Kumar Mishra Vs The Jai Prakash University Chapra, Through Its Registrar Namely and Ors.

Derby Mercantil Pvt. Ltd. Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

M/s Bscpl Infrastructure Ltd. Vs The State of Bihar

Sumit Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Satyendra Kumar Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Manta Yadav Vs The State of Bihar