Petitioner sought mandamus to demolish illegal construction by a respondent. The petitioner was satisfied with action already taken and did not press the petition.
Petition disposed of as not pressed by the petitioner.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.5026 of 2013
======================================================
Prashant Kumar Ray S/O Late Ramayan Ray R/O Mohalla-Kathwalia, P.S.Anddistt-Gopalganj
... ... Petitioner/s
... ... Respondent/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Ranjeet Kumar Pandey, Adv. For the State : Mr.Sita Ram Yadav, G.P.-16 Mr. Yatindna Narayan, AC to GP-16 Mr. Jitendra Kumar, AC to GP-16 For the Respondent : Mr. Nagendra Rai, Adv. Mr. Navin Nikunj, Adv. ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER
6 16-03-2023 The present writ petition has been filed seeking the
following reliefs:-
“1(a). For issuance of writ in the nature of mandamus directing the Respondents to demolish the illegal construction which has been made by the Respondent No. 6 upon the encroached Government as well as private land after making deviation from the approved map passed by the Nagar Parishad, Gopalganj.
(b). For issuance of writ in the nature of mandamus directing the Respondents to take legal
Patna High Court CWJC No.5026 of 2013(6) dt.16-03-2023 2/2
action against the Respondent No. 6 for making such illegal construction upon the encroached Government as well as private land after making deviation from the approved map passed by the Nagar Gopalganj. Parishad.”
At the outset, the learned counsel appearing for the Respondent-Nagar Parishad, Gopalganj, has submitted that the final order has already been passed, whereby and whereunder fine has been imposed upon the Respondent No. 6 for the deviations made in the house constructed by her and she has been directed to remove the deviations made vis-a-vis the sanctioned plan. It is also submitted that within a period of four weeks from today, the illegal construction made by the Respondent No. 6 shall be removed.
In view of the aforesaid, the learned counsel for the petitioner is satifised that appropriate action, as warranted, has been taken, hence, he does not wish to press the present writ petition.
Accordingly, the present writ petition stands disposed off as not pressed.
(Mohit Kumar Shah, J)
Ajay/- U
Prashant Kumar Ray
The State Of Bihar
Mohit Kumar Shah
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
