Allowed

Ajay Mandal v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC11 Sept 2023CR. MISC./6784/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In an appeal against rejection of regular bail in a case under Section 302 IPC where the petitioner, allegedly in anger, caused the death of his youngest son, the single judge discharged its duty by ordering the petitioner's release on bail.

What did the court decide?

The petitioner is directed to be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of the like amount.

Ajay Mandal Vs The State of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2023)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.6784 of 2023

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-83 Year-2019 Thana- SHERGHATI District- Gaya

¶3

======================================================

¶4

AJAY MANDAL Son of Bhushan Mandal R/V- Haradawan, P.S- Dobhi, DistGaya

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Ajit Ranjan Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Akhileshwar Dayal ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER

¶10

4 11-09-2023

¶11

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

¶12

The petitioner has prayed for regular bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under sections 302 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶13

As per prosecution case, the allegation against the petitioner is that he in anger threw his youngest son on the ground due to which he sustained head injury and died.

¶14

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He has falsely been implicated in this case. It is submitted that the wife of the petitioner passed away a month ago and he wants to keep his all sons with him but the informant and other in-

¶15

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.6784 of 2023(4) dt.11-09-2023 2/2

¶16

laws are pressurizing him to leave his youngest son with him. It is further submitted that there is no intention to kill the deceased, it happened at the spur of moment while in-laws of the petitioner were snatching his son from him at that time his son slipped from his hand and fell down on the ground due to which he sustained head injury and died. The petitioner has got no criminal antecedent. Moreover, he is languishing in judicial custody since 08.05.2022.

¶17

Learned APP appearing for the state has opposed the prayer of regular bail.

¶18

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case as well as custody of the petitioner, this court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be released on bail in connection with Sherghati P.S. Case No. 83 of 2019 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.C.J.M., Sherghati, Gaya.

¶19

(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J)

¶20

Manishkumar/-

¶21

U T

Ajay Mandal v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ajay Mandal v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Suraj Kumar Vs the State of Bihar

Dilip Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Rohit Kumar @ Golu Vs The State of Bihar

Lala Rajbanshi Vs The State of Bihar

Vikash Ram @ Vikash Rai Vs the State of Bihar

Dharmendra Rai @ Dharmendra Kumar Rai Vs The State of Bihar