This order rejected the petitioner's bail plea in a murder case involving shooting. The court noted direct allegations and post-mortem support for the prosecution, directing the trial court to conclude the trial within one year.
Bail prayer rejected; trial to be concluded within one year.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.14021 of 2023
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-149 Year-2022 Thana- PATNA CITY CHOWK District- Patna
======================================================
ROHIT KUMAR @ GOLU S/O AMARNATH YADAV R/o- Kathotiya Gali, P.S.- Chowk, District- Patna
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Pramod Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Sanjay Kumar Singh ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER
3 08-09-2023
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned
APP for the State.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.14021 of 2023(3) dt.08-09-2023 2/2
petitioner is innocent and committed no offence. He has falsely been implicated in this case. It is further submitted that the petitioner is languishing in judicial custody since 8.4.2022.
(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J)
lata/- U T
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is entitled to bail in a case involving murder, criminal conspiracy, robbery, and discharge of ammunition?
Whether the trial should be expedited and concluded within a year?
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Rohit Kumar @ Golu
The State of Bihar
Sunil Kumar Panwar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
